Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

Record Atlantic SSTs continue in the hurricane Main Development Region
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 08:03 PM GMT on Maj 15, 2010 +7
Sea Surface Temperatures (SSTs) in the Atlantic's Main Development Region for hurricanes had their warmest April on record, according to an analysis of historical SST data from the UK Hadley Center. SST data goes back to 1850, though there is much missing data before 1910 and during WWI and WWII. The area between 10°N and 20°N, between the coast of Africa and Central America (20°W - 80°W), is called the Main Development Region (MDR) because virtually all African waves originate in this region. These African waves account for 85% of all Atlantic major hurricanes and 60% of all named storms. When SSTs in the MDR are much above average during hurricane season, a very active season typically results (if there is no El Niño event present.) SSTs in the Main Development Region (10°N to 20°N and 20°W to 85°W) were an eye-opening 1.46°C above average during April. This is the third straight record warm month, and the warmest anomaly measured for any month--by a remarkable 0.2°C. The previous record warmest anomalies for the Atlantic MDR were set in June 2005 and March 2010, at 1.26°C.


Figure 1. The departure of sea surface temperature (SST) from average for May 13, 2010. Image credit: NOAA/NESDIS.

What is responsible for the high SSTs?
As I explained in detail in a post on record February SSTs in the Atlantic, the Arctic Oscillation (AO) and its close cousin, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), are largely to blame for the record SSTs. The AO and NAO are climate patterns in the North Atlantic Ocean related to fluctuations in the difference of sea-level pressure between the Icelandic Low and the Azores-Bermuda High. If the difference in sea-level pressure between Iceland and the Azores is small (negative NAO), this creates a weak Azores-Bermuda High, which reduces the trade winds circulating around the High. During December - February, we had the most negative AO/NAO since records began in 1950, and this caused trade winds between Africa and the Lesser Antilles Islands in the hurricane Main Development Region to slow to 1 - 2 m/s (2.2 - 4.5 mph) below average. Slower trade winds mean less mixing of the surface waters with cooler waters down deep, plus less evaporational cooling of the surface water. As a result, the ocean heated up significantly, relative to normal, over the winter. Negative AO/NAO conditions have been dominant much of this spring as well, resulting in further anomalous heating of the MDR waters. This heating is superimposed on the very warm global SSTs we've been seeing over the past few decades due to global warming. Global and Northern Hemisphere SSTs were the 2nd warmest on record this past December, January, and February, the warmest on record in March, and will likely be classified as the warmest or second warmest on record for April, since NASA just classified April as the warmest April on record for the globe. We are also in the warm phase of a decades-long natural oscillation in Atlantic ocean temperatures called the Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation (AMO). This warm phase began in 1995, and has been partially responsible for the high levels of hurricane activity we've seen since 1995.

What does this imply for the coming hurricane season?
The high April SST anomaly does not bode well for the coming hurricane season. The three past seasons with record warm April SST anomalies all had abnormally high numbers of intense hurricanes. Past hurricane seasons that had high March SST anomalies include 1969 (0.90°C anomaly), 2005 (1.19°C anomaly), and 1958 (0.97°C anomaly). These three years had 5, 7, and 5 intense hurricanes, respectively. Just two intense hurricanes occur in an average year. The total averaged activity for the three seasons was 15 named storms, 11 hurricanes, and 6 intense hurricanes (an average hurricane season has 10, 6, and 2.) Both 1958 and 2005 saw neutral El Niño conditions, while 1969 had a weak El Niño.

The SSTs are already as warm as we normally see in July between Africa and the Caribbean, and we have a very July-like tropical wave approaching the Lesser Antilles Islands this weekend. However, wind shear is still seasonably high, and the tropical waves coming off of Africa are still too far south to have much of a chance of developing. The GFS model is indicating that shear will start to drop over the Caribbean the last week of May, so we may have to be on the watch for tropical storms forming in the Caribbean then.

For those of you interested in a more detailed look at the early season tropical weather outlook, consult the excellent wunderblogs of StormW and Weather456. I'll be back with a new post on Monday.

Jeff Masters
Categories: Hurricane
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 301 - 351

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27Blog Index

301. Cavin Rawlins 02:36 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting KoritheMan:


I don't think mere tropical waves are potent enough to significantly upwell SSTs, at least not in the Caribbean, the area we typically see our most intense hurricanes.


the average winds in a tropical wave are less than 25 knots.

the average speed of a tropical wave is 10-20 knots.

i would not look for a tropical wave to upwell ssts enough to cool them by even 1C.

You would also need a series of tropical storms and hurricanes to cool the Atlantic to near normal and offset the rising sun as we near the peak of the NH summer.
Member Since: Juli 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
302. BahaHurican 02:36 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Member Since: Oktober 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17682
303. pottery 02:37 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting KoritheMan:


I don't think mere tropical waves are potent enough to significantly upwell SSTs, at least not in the Caribbean, the area we typically see our most intense hurricanes.

No, I dont really think so either. I was being obscure.
But what a strange and peculiar set-up we have right now.
I think I will go and read those ancient Mayan texts again....
Member Since: Oktober 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20714
304. Stormchaser2007 02:37 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Looks like the Gulf is going to go though another warming phase. This time the loop current may reach 90F. This model has verified excellent so far this year.

Amazing.

Current:


72 hours:
Member Since: Juni 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15248
305. KEEPEROFTHEGATE (Mod) 02:38 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
This season could shape up far worse than 2005, we'll have to wait and see.
no it will not beat 2005 in number of systems maybe number of landfalling storms but i don't think we will see 32 systems like 05
Member Since: Juli 15, 2006 Posts: 144 Comments: 40651
306. Bordonaro 02:38 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting wunderkidcayman:
hey guy's can you get me all the info of the "E" volcaino because my sister is coming from the UK tomrrow evening please I have not see her in over a few years

Link to the Iceland ash cloud forecast, ask your sister to call the airport, like, as soon as possible, they might cancel her flight:

Link
Recent article about air space closures in UK:

Link
Member Since: August 25, 2009 Posts: 20 Comments: 6785
307. MiamiHurricanes09 02:39 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Stormchaser2007:
Looks like the Gulf is going to go though another warming phase. This time the loop current may reach 90F. This model has verified excellent so far this year.

Current:


72 hours:
That is insanity, it will be very nice to see what happens.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
308. BahaHurican 02:40 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Look at how much further north the two lows over Africa are.... someone [Haboobsrsweet?] was mentioning detracting factors for May formation, and I concur with most if not all of what they said. However, if Twaves are going to be popping off the coast near 10N, we may after all be seeing a different story.
Member Since: Oktober 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17682
309. KEEPEROFTHEGATE (Mod) 02:40 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
2005 ATLANTIC SEASON
1 Tropical Storm ARLENE 08-13 JUN 60 30 -
2 Tropical Storm BRET 28-30 JUN 35 1002 -
3 Hurricane CINDY 03-07 JUL 65 992 1
4 Hurricane DENNIS 05-13 JUL 130 930 4
5 Hurricane EMILY 11-21 JUL 135 929 4
6 Tropical Storm FRANKLIN 21-29 JUL 60 997 -
7 Tropical Storm GERT 23-25 JUL 40 1005 -
8 Tropical Storm HARVEY 02-08 AUG 55 994 -
9 Hurricane IRENE 04-18 AUG 85 975 2
10 Tropical Depression TEN 13-14 AUG 30 1008 -
11 Tropical Storm JOSE 22-23 AUG 45 1001 -
12 Hurricane KATRINA 23-31 AUG 150 902 5
13 Tropical Storm LEE 28 AUG-02 SEP 35 1007 -
14 Hurricane MARIA 01-10 SEP 100 960 3
15 Hurricane NATE 05-10 SEP 80 979 1
16 Hurricane OPHELIA 06-18 SEP 80 976 1
17 Hurricane PHILIPPE 17-24 SEP 70 985 1
18 Hurricane RITA 18-26 SEP 150 897 5
19 Tropical Depression NINETE 30 SEP-02 OCT 30 1006 -
20 Hurricane STAN 01-05 OCT 70 979 1
21 Tropical Storm TAMMY 05-06 OCT 45 30 -
22 Tropical Depression TWENTY 08-09 OCT 30 1009 -
23 Hurricane VINCE 09-11 OCT 65 987 1
24 Hurricane WILMA 15-25 OCT 150 882 5
25 Tropical Storm ALPHA 22-24 OCT 45 998 -
26 Hurricane BETA 27-31 OCT 100 960 3
27 Tropical Depression TWENTY 14-16 NOV 30 1004 -
28 Tropical Storm GAMMA 18-21 NOV 40 1004 -
29 Tropical Storm DELTA 23-28 NOV 60 980 -
30 Hurricane EPSILON 29 NOV-08 DEC 75 979 1
31 Tropical Storm ZETA 30 DEC-06 JAN 55 994 -
Member Since: Juli 15, 2006 Posts: 144 Comments: 40651
310. MiamiHurricanes09 02:40 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting KEEPEROFTHEGATE:
no it will not beat 2005 in number of systems maybe number of landfalling storms but i don't think we will see 32 systems like 05
Me either, but what do we know, anything is possible. Nobody expected 2005 was going to be so big. Do you know what I mean?
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
311. Cavin Rawlins 02:40 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
A more reasonable upper estimate is 20 named storms
A more reasonable lower estimate is 15 named storms.

2010 could rank in the top 10, possibly the top 5.
Member Since: Juli 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
312. MiamiHurricanes09 02:41 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:
A more reasonable upper estimate is 20 named storms
A more reasonable lower estimate is 15 named storms.

2010 could rank in the top 10, possibly the top 5.
I agree.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
313. StormChaser81 02:43 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Getting very close to the Loop Current.
Member Since: August 11, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 2315
314. BahaHurican 02:43 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
re 311.

This sounds more in line w/ what I am expecting. I wouldn't be surprised to get to 21, or possibly even 23 (though I don't expect that). But in that active period of the 20s to 40s, there was only one 21+ season; other busy seasons were around 17....
Member Since: Oktober 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17682
315. Cavin Rawlins 02:44 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Also remember that most forecasters predict around 15-18 named storms. What is interesting is that all other conditions resemble 2005 but because we see 2005 as an anomaly I believe most of these numbers were under constraint. We cannot go beyond a certain limit because of our understanding. These numbers appear to be the limit of said understanding.
Member Since: Juli 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
316. pottery 02:46 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:
A more reasonable upper estimate is 20 named storms
A more reasonable lower estimate is 15 named storms.

2010 could rank in the top 10, possibly the top 5.

Interesting. On what basis are you saying that 2010 will be lower than 2005?
What existed in 05 that caused the high numbers, that dont exist now?
Member Since: Oktober 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20714
317. MiamiHurricanes09 02:46 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
NOAA will release their numbers on:

Thursday, May 20, 11:00 am EDT
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
318. Ossqss 02:46 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Atlantic Season Contest

Gotta run, but where are Storm, Drak, 456, Sky, Orca and on and on?

Be well all, L8R >>

Hey, it is your contest, I am just the conduit :)

Time is short! >>>> Out :)
Member Since: Juni 12, 2005 Posts: 6 Comments: 8154
319. BahaHurican 02:46 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
I think we have a hard time conceptualizing that much energy in the ATL. Nobody bats an eye at 25 storms in the WPac....
Member Since: Oktober 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17682
320. Cavin Rawlins 02:47 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting pottery:

Interesting. On what basis are you saying that 2010 will be lower than 2005?
What existed in 05 that caused the high numbers, that dont exist now?


See post 315
Member Since: Juli 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
321. pottery 02:47 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Post 315. OK, I think you answered me there.
Member Since: Oktober 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20714
322. pottery 02:49 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting BahaHurican:
I think we have a hard time conceptualizing that much energy in the ATL. Nobody bats an eye at 25 storms in the WPac....

Very good point.
Member Since: Oktober 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20714
323. pottery 02:52 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:
Also remember that most forecasters predict around 15-18 named storms. What is interesting is that all other conditions resemble 2005 but because we see 2005 as an anomaly I believe most of these numbers were under constraint. We cannot go beyond a certain limit because of our understanding. These numbers appear to be the limit of said understanding.

But the reality is, there were more than 30 storms in the Atl. in 2005.
What is the problem with 40?
Member Since: Oktober 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20714
324. cchsweatherman 02:53 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:
Also remember that most forecasters predict around 15-18 named storms. What is interesting is that all other conditions resemble 2005 but because we see 2005 as an anomaly I believe most of these numbers were under constraint. We cannot go beyond a certain limit because of our understanding. These numbers appear to be the limit of said understanding.


Very well stated there man.
Member Since: April 14, 2007 Posts: 8 Comments: 4926
325. Cavin Rawlins 02:53 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
The most we can do at this point is pray and hope that by season ends we all come out with a sign of relief and thankfulness. Caribbean economies will suffer if forecasts verify and I dont think that would help haiti rebuilding efforts and people who are still trying to stand on their feet after 2004, 2005, 2007, and 2008.

Member Since: Juli 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
326. MiamiHurricanes09 02:54 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
This model is warming things up really quickly.

Current


72 hours
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
327. PcolaDan 02:54 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting wunderkidcayman:
hey guy's can you get me all the info of the "E" volcaino because my sister is coming from the UK tomrrow evening please I have not see her in over a few years


It's going to be close. Like Bord said, they need to call the airline.

Officials have warned the ash from volcanic eruptions in Iceland could disrupt air travel in both Britain and Germany in the next few days.

The British Department of Transport on Saturday stated a possible closure of parts of British airspace on the weekend, saying those problems could persist through Tuesday.

The department said different parts of British airspace could close at different times in the next few days, which would include England's southeast -- home to Europe's busiest airport at Heathrow as well as Gatwick, Stansted and other major airports.
Member Since: August 22, 2008 Posts: 12 Comments: 6008
328. aquak9 02:54 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting StormChaser81:
Getting very close to the Loop Current.


stormchaser, I believe it's already there, just not visibly, errr, on the surface.

this is a short article but I'd love some intelligent points of view here.

Link
Member Since: August 13, 2005 Posts: 163 Comments: 25008
329. KEEPEROFTHEGATE (Mod) 02:56 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting pottery:

Interesting. On what basis are you saying that 2010 will be lower than 2005?
What existed in 05 that caused the high numbers, that dont exist now?
there is always a possiblity i guess it can exceed 05 season but i hesitate in calling that because

The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active Atlantic hurricane season in recorded history

and hopefully 2010 don't have in its mind to become the greatest season ever cause if it does then it will be an all time record just like the infamous 2005 season
Member Since: Juli 15, 2006 Posts: 144 Comments: 40651
330. Cavin Rawlins 02:56 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting pottery:

But the reality is, there were more than 30 storms in the Atl. in 2005.
What is the problem with 40?


As Baha rightfully said, I cannot conceptualized such numbers. That is super hyper active. Our limit of understand is the hurricane season of 1933. 2005 to us is an anomaly. We are not saying that we cannot have 25+ storms, but how do you make a forecast for such numbers? thats the big question.

Member Since: Juli 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
331. pottery 02:57 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:
The most we can do at this point is pray and hope that by season ends we all come out with a sign of relief and thankfulness. Caribbean economies will suffer if forecasts verify and I dont think that would help haiti rebuilding efforts and people who are still trying to stand on their feet after 2004, 2005, 2007, and 2008.


A big AMEN to that.
Member Since: Oktober 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20714
332. cchsweatherman 02:57 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
I'm probably in the extreme minority here, but I don't see any real use for numerical predictions before any hurricane season since numbers, at least in my opinion, don't matter when it comes to evaluating a hurricane season. The most important things when it comes to hurricane season are when and where storms make landfall and what impact do they have on those areas. Sure numbers may show that a hurricane season has above average activity, but in the end, its the toll on life that really counts.
Member Since: April 14, 2007 Posts: 8 Comments: 4926
333. lickitysplit 02:58 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
NYT:

Scientists Find Giant Plumes of Oil Forming Under the Gulf

"Scientists are finding enormous oil plumes in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, including one as large as 10 miles long, 3 miles wide and 300 feet thick. The discovery is fresh evidence that the leak from the broken undersea well could be substantially worse than estimates that the government and BP have given."

Member Since: Maj 17, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 621
334. BahaHurican 02:58 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:
The most we can do at this point is pray and hope that by season ends we all come out with a sign of relief and thankfulness. Caribbean economies will suffer if forecasts verify and I dont think that would help haiti rebuilding efforts and people who are still trying to stand on their feet after 2004, 2005, 2007, and 2008.

This is my big concern. I think Haiti symbolizes for us the very real concern the entire Caribbean basin should have this season. While our individual situations are not as dire as Haiti's in a literal sense, metaphorically we are all as vulnerable to the aftermath of a hurricane, especially a major hurricane, or, even worse, a series of hurricanes. Economies which are already very fragile because of the economic "earthquake" of the recession may very well go under if forced to endure the negative effects on tourism and agriculture typically associated with a hurricane strike...
Member Since: Oktober 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17682
335. MiamiHurricanes09 02:58 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:


As Baha rightfully said, I cannot conceptualized such numbers. That is super hyper active. Our limit of understand is the hurricane season of 1933. 2005 to us is an anomaly. We are not saying that we cannot have 25+ storms, but how do you make a forecast for such numbers? thats the big question.

I believe 1933 had far more hurricanes than 2005 because back then they didn't have the technology to go east of 50˚W.

Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
336. hurricane23 02:58 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Doesn't get any better then this.
Member Since: Maj 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13277
337. pottery 03:00 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:


As Baha rightfully said, I cannot conceptualized such numbers. That is super hyper active. Our limit of understand is the hurricane season of 1933. 2005 to us is an anomaly. We are not saying that we cannot have 25+ storms, but how do you make a forecast for such numbers? thats the big question.


Thanks.. Understood.
I am still going with my 19 for the season (total storms)
Member Since: Oktober 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20714
338. Cavin Rawlins 03:00 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
For example, on May 16 2005, NOAA predicted 12–15 named storms with full understanding that SSTs were near record levels. At this point, 1933 was the most active, followed by 1995. Because of our understanding at the time of normal and above normal seasons, we could not foresee 28 named storms.

It is the same with 2010.
Member Since: Juli 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
339. aquak9 03:02 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting aquak9:


stormchaser, I believe it's already there, just not visibly, errr, on the surface.

this is a short article but I'd love some intelligent points of view here.

Link


still hoping for a comment? could this be correct?
Member Since: August 13, 2005 Posts: 163 Comments: 25008
340. SouthALWX 03:03 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
456, basically you are saying the science can't quantify the data without a previous "experiment" with very similar conditions? If that's so then I agree 100%. On the other hand, If we were to pose the question in probability form, I feel a greater percentage of possible outcomes has to be estimated at super hyper active than super sub-active would you not agree?

Let's try this:
super sub active 5%
below average 10%
average 20%
above average 50%
super hyper active 15%
Member Since: August 27, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 1497
341. cchsweatherman 03:03 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting hurricane23:
Doesn't get any better then this.


I love Allan Huffman's site. Thats the only site I use now for accessing computer models since his site offers pretty much all the models available and so many different products from each model. Now with the ECMWF images, its gonna be even better. I like to call it one stop model surfing.
Member Since: April 14, 2007 Posts: 8 Comments: 4926
342. pottery 03:04 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting BahaHurican:
This is my big concern. I think Haiti symbolizes for us the very real concern the entire Caribbean basin should have this season. While our individual situations are not as dire as Haiti's in a literal sense, metaphorically we are all as vulnerable to the aftermath of a hurricane, especially a major hurricane, or, even worse, a series of hurricanes. Economies which are already very fragile because of the economic "earthquake" of the recession may very well go under if forced to endure the negative effects on tourism and agriculture typically associated with a hurricane strike...

And that, is the reality of the thing.
Very Well said, Baha.
Member Since: Oktober 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20714
343. hurricane23 03:04 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Almost forgot see THIS.
Member Since: Maj 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13277
344. BahaHurican 03:04 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:


As Baha rightfully said, I cannot conceptualized such numbers. That is super hyper active. Our limit of understand is the hurricane season of 1933. 2005 to us is an anomaly. We are not saying that we cannot have 25+ storms, but how do you make a forecast for such numbers? thats the big question.

I think 20 is about the outside of what most wx scientists would reasonably expect. I also think we [general public, bloggers] wouldn't even be thinking 20 if we didn't have 2005 in our recent memory. And with good reason, imo. How many seasons, before or after 1950, have exceeded that 20 storm "limit"? To forecast 25 or 30, wouldn't one need to have a greater statistical basis?
Member Since: Oktober 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17682
345. Stormchaser2007 03:07 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting hurricane23:
Almost forgot see THIS.


Man Im glad that ECM is freeing up some of their products to the public. The ECMWF (and its ensembles) have been pretty good this year and it looks like we'll need them a lot for this upcoming Hurricane season.

Thanks for the links Adrian!
Member Since: Juni 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15248
347. Cavin Rawlins 03:08 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting SouthALWX:
456, basically you are saying the science can't quantify the data without a previous "experiment" with very similar conditions? If that's so then I agree 100%. On the other hand, If we were to pose the question in probability form, I feel a greater percentage of possible outcomes has to be estimated at super hyper active than super sub-active would you not agree?

Let's try this:
super sub active 5%
below average 10%
average 20%
above average 50%
super hyper active 15%


Hit the nail on the head. And when we say experiment, we cannot use 2005 since that is one year. We would have to use years where SSTs were at this level and how do we do that when 2010 has the highest? All other selected years will fall short.

Probabilities may help solve the problem but it seems there is a 80% of an above average season.
Member Since: Juli 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
348. KEEPEROFTHEGATE (Mod) 03:09 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting BahaHurican:
I think 20 is about the outside of what most wx scientists would reasonably expect. I also think we [general public, bloggers] wouldn't even be thinking 20 if we didn't have 2005 in our recent memory. And with good reason, imo. How many seasons, before or after 1950, have exceeded that 20 storm "limit"? To forecast 25 or 30, wouldn't one need to have a greater statistical basis?


these are the numbers i believe could be possible

TOTAL STORMS 21 TO 23
TOTAL HURRICANES 11 TO 14
TOTAL MAJORS 5 TO 7
TOTAL CAT 5's 1 TO 3
Member Since: Juli 15, 2006 Posts: 144 Comments: 40651
349. pottery 03:09 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting lickitysplit:
NYT:

Scientists Find Giant Plumes of Oil Forming Under the Gulf

"Scientists are finding enormous oil plumes in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, including one as large as 10 miles long, 3 miles wide and 300 feet thick. The discovery is fresh evidence that the leak from the broken undersea well could be substantially worse than estimates that the government and BP have given."


That is REALLY scary. But I was wondering about that today when I was looking at Gulf currents.
The currents are so mixed up in there, and there are currents and counter-currents and the dam place where the oil is leaking is nearly a MILE deep.
There are bound to be oil-layers moving around under there.
Maybe not as much as that quote said, but who knows?
Member Since: Oktober 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20714
350. xcool 03:09 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
hey Adrian!
Member Since: September 26, 2009 Posts: 2 Comments: 15503
351. hurricane23 03:11 AM GMT on Maj 16, 2010    
Quoting Stormchaser2007:


Man Im glad that ECM is freeing up some of their products to the public. The ECMWF (and its ensembles) have been pretty good this year and it looks like we'll need them a lot for this upcoming Hurricane season.

Thanks for the links Adrian!


Hey no problem... 850mb T and anomalies have also been added to the regular site which is also great. graphics will now be out to 240 regularly.
Member Since: Maj 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13277

Viewing: 301 - 351

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity